얼음꽃 (아이유 & 김연아)

아저씨들이 가장 좋아하는 탑2, 연아 & 아이유

삼성증권 미러링 어카운트

삼성증권의 미러링 어카운트, 괜찮은 듯 합니다.

그동안 펀드와 정기예금만 넣었는데, 여기도 한번 넣어볼까 고민중~

삼성증권 국내 첫 ‘미러링어카운트’ 서비스 27일 시작

1. 미러링어카운트 서비스는 무엇인가요?
미러링어카운트 서비스는 고객(투자자)스스로 포트폴리오 전략을 선택하여 투자할 수 있는 서비스 입니다.
삼성증권과 투자자간의 투자일임계약을 통해 제공되며 고객 스스로 선택한 포트폴리오 전략에 따라 삼성증권이 투자자산을 맡아서 매매해 드리는 서비스입니다.
※ 투자일임계약이란, 삼성증권이 고객으로부터 유가증권 투자에 대해 투자판단의 전부 또는 일부를 일임받아 고객의 자산을 운용하는 계약을 의미합니다.

2. 서비스의 특징은 무엇인가요?
미러링어카운트 서비스는 고객이 스스로 투자하는 직접투자와 전문가에게 돈을 맡기는 간접투자 두 가지의 장점을 모두 가지고 있습니다.

이러한 미러링어카운트 만의 장점은 다음과 같이 요약 될 수 있습니다.

– 고객이 직접 포트폴리오 전략을 선택 합니다.
삼성증권이 제공하는 다양한 투자모델들 중 하나를 선택하는 것으로 고객이 직접 본인의 투자전략을 정할 수 있습니다. 종목을 선택하는 대신 포트폴리오 전략을 선택 하는 것입니다.

– 온라인을 통한 편리한 투자를 할 수 있습니다.
미러링어카운트 가입 후에 온라인 접속을 통해 본인의 포트폴리오를 변경할 수 있어 변화되는 시장에 신속히 대응하며 자신만의 포트폴리오를 관리 할 수 있습니다.

– 특허에 기반한 미러링 운용 시스템을 통해 매매해 드립니다.
삼성증권이 보유한 특허기술에 의해 새롭게 개발된 미러링운용 시스템을 활용하여 투자모델상의 매매정보를 신속히 포착→검증→매매하여 고객님 계좌의 매매를 발생 시켜 드립니다.

– 나만의 전략을 구성할 수 있습니다.
다양한 투자모델 중 하나 또는 복수의 것을 선택하고, 추가적으로 특정 종목을 제외 하며, 손실범위를 정하여 나만의 포트폴리오 전략을 구성할 수 있습니다.

3. 미러링어카운트 서비스와 펀드와는 무슨 차이가 있나요?
미러링어카운트 서비스가 펀드와 갖는 가장 큰 차이점은 고객님의 선택에 따라 포트폴리오 전략의 변경이 가능 하다는 것입니다.
펀드의 경우 사전에 미리 정해진 투자전략에 따라 운용되는 금융투자상품으로서 가입 후 고객님의 요청에 따라 펀드의 운용 전략을 변경하는 것이 불가능 합니다. 이러한 차이점 이외에도 미러링어카운트 서비스와 펀드는 다음과 같은 주요한 차이점을 가지고 있습니다.

– 미러링어카운트는 투자대상 주식의 직접적인 소유권을 고객이 갖게 되는 반면 펀드 투자자는 편입된 종목의 소유권을 갖지 못합니다.
즉, 미러링어카운트의 운용은 고객님 명의의 계좌에서 개별적으로 이루어 지지만 펀드는 가입고객들의 자산을 하나로 모아 공통적으로 운용 하는 것입니다.

– 펀드는 정해진 운용전략의 수정이 불가능 하나, 미러링어카운트 서비스는 고정된 운용전략이 없으므로 온라인에서 투자모델을 변경하는 것으로서 언제든지 고객님의 성향과 요청에 따라 운용전략의 변경이 가능 합니다.

– 펀드와는 달리 미러링어카운트에서 발생된 수익에 대해서 고객님은 별도의 세금을 부담하지 않습니다.

– 펀드는 판매보수/운용보수/환매수수료 등 복잡한 가격 구조를 갖는 반면 미러링어카운트 서비스는 정해진 비율의 일임수수료 이외에는 일체의 부가 비용이 존재하지 않습니다.

from http://popeye.samsungfn.com/trading/index.html

Git User’s Manual

Git is a distributed revision control system with an emphasis on speed. Git was initially designed and developed by Linus Torvalds for Linux kernel development. Every Git working directory is a full-fledged repository with complete history and full revision tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access or a central server. Git’s current software maintenance is overseen by Junio Hamano. Git is free software distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2.

Git User’s Manual
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html

Git 사용자 설명서
번역 : 김남형 2009-04-13 ~ 2009-08-26
http://namhyung.springnote.com/pages/3132772

Introduction to LaTex

LaTeX is a document preparation system for high-quality typesetting. It is most often used for medium-to-large technical or scientific documents but it can be used for almost any form of publishing.

LaTeX is not a word processor! Instead, LaTeX encourages authors not to worry too much about the appearance of their documents but to concentrate on getting the right content.

A (Not So) Short Introduction to LaTeX2e

A short introduction to LaTeX 2e (Korean)

워드 프로세서 사용자를 위한 LaTeX

Online converter – ps to pdf

GhostScript/GhostView 설치할 필요없이 PS 파일을 PDF 문서로 온라인에서 변환해줌

http://ps2pdf.com/convert.htm

Linux Flash File Systems

Choosing a venue: conference or journal?

From:
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/mernst/advice/conferences-vs-journals.html

by Michael Ernst (mernst@cs.washington.edu)
December, 2006

Why to prefer a conference

In computer science, your preference should be for conference
publication. Here are some reasons.

• Conferences have higher status. In part this is a historical artifact of
  the field of computer science, but it is self-perpetuating since that makes
  the best researchers want to send their papers to conferences rather than
  journals.
• Conferences provide higher visibility and greater impact. Many people will
  attend your talk, you will have the opportunity to answer questions, and
  people will talk to both you and to one another in the hallways. Even
  disregarding the event itself, more non-attendees read conference
  proceedings than read journals.
• Conferences have higher quality. Acceptance rates to good conferences are
  often around 10% (at least in software engineering, which is my field),
  whereas even the best journals are less selective. Naturally, there exist
  low-quality conferences (and journals), but if your c.v. is cluttered with
  them, then you will appear to be incapable of good work (even if the work
  you published in those venues really is good!), and your good publications
  will not stand out. A good rule of thumb is that the best conferences are
  sponsored by ACM.
• Conferences are more timely. It can take years for a journal publication
  to appear (or even for reviews to come back), whereas the turnaround time
  for conference reviews is a few months, and the proceedings also appear
  quickly.
• Conferences have higher standards of novelty. Journals often only require
  20-30% of the material to be new, compared to an earlier conference version.

Why to prefer a journal

There are situations in which journal publication is desirable.

• Journals may have longer page limits. If you have too many experimental
  results to fit in a conference publication, then a journal affords an
  opportunity to include them. You can also include proofs that are too long
  (or boring) for a shorter publication. A journal paper could recap or
  given an overview of an entire research area.
• Journal reviews tend to be more detailed. A journal reviewer may spend
  days on a paper, whereas a conference reviewer cannot afford to do so for
  each of the many papers he or she is assigned. This is in part
  because conference reviewers often believe the authors’ claims (regarding a
  proof, for example), whereas journal reviewers are expected to verify them.
  It may also be in part because of the expectation that the paper will be
  revised and re-submitted to the same journal. In any event, the extra
  details can help you to improve your work or to understand its shortcomings.
• Journals give the opportunity to revise your work and re-submit it for
  review. Actually, conferences give this too: if a paper is rejected from
  one conference, then you can revise based on the reviewers’ comments and
  submit to a different conference, or the same one the next year.
• Journals have higher acceptance rates, giving the opportunity to get your
  research published. The same is true of workshops. These are particularly
  good venues for people who are just starting their research careers.
• Some lesser-ranked universities evaluate faculty on the basis of
  journal publications, because the Dean of Engineering is unable or unwilling to
  understand computer science. In most scientific fields, journals have
  higher standards than conferences; computer science is a rare exception.
  A top-ranked CS department can
  convince the dean to use the proper evaluation metric. A lower-ranked CS
  department cannot (the dean may think the department is trying to fool him
  or her).
  If you are at one of these universities, you will need to publish in
  journals, probably by submitting slightly revised versions of your
  conference papers to journals.
  The rush for people at lower-ranked universities (some of whom are
  excellent researchers, and some of whom are not) to submit even marginal
  results to journals is another regrettable factor that tends to lower the
  overall quality of journals.

The best papers at a conference are often solicited for expedited journal
publication.
I sometimes decline these opportunities, but your circumstances may be different.
Whether you accept this invitation should be based on the
factors above, such as whether there is value to the community of an
expanded version of the paper, and how much more work it is to prepare the
journal version. (For example, is there a thesis, technical report, or
other document with additional material beyond the conference paper? Even
better, are there additions that were suggested by reviewers or during
discussions at the conference?)

The journal version of a publication will be cited more than the conference
version, because the journal version has a later date and thus seems more
authoritative. This is a good thing if the journal version adds real value
(or corrects problems!). However, if you have cluttered the paper with a
lot of details that aren’t crucial (like extra tables of results,
experiments that support your point slightly less strongly than the main
ones, or discussions of tangential issues), then your paper may actually
have less impact because readers will get mired in the irrelevant details.
Good writing can avoid such problems.

How to write good engineering papers

How to write good engineering papars

Papers in Conference vs Journal vs Magazine

* Conference vs Journal
  - Conference 
    Need a meeting
    One of the authors requires to come to the conference
    7 ~ 8 pages
  - Journal
    Printed
    Not happened

* Conference vs Workshop
  - Conference
    broad topics
    3 ~ 4 days
    Big
  - Workshop
    narrow topics
    1 ~ 2 days
    small
    2, 3 Workshops become Conference

* Magazine vs Journal
  - Magazine
    simple, not technical
    introduction
  - Journal
    very technical

* Process: Magazine -> Conference (or workshop) -> Journal